What We’re Reading

What We’re Reading

- in News

Get recommendations from New York Times reporters and editors, highlighting great stories from around the web. What We’re Reading emails are sent twice a week.

The presidential race lasted for two years and somehow ended in a surprise. These are the stories from our band of political reporters that stand out now. They offer in-the-moment snapshots of the factors that enabled Donald Trump’s ascendance, from his opponents’ strategic failures to his appeal to the disaffected. — Carolyn Ryan

Photo

Credit Doug Mills/The New York Times

The Message of Change

A significant subset of voters who re-elected Barack Obama in 2012 found themselves more attuned to Mr. Trump than Mrs. Clinton. “He’s not going to promise me change, and then not do that,” a supporter in Cleveland said.

Photo

Credit Damon Winter/The New York Times

Left Out

In June of last year, our reporters delivered this story, which provoked strong reaction in the political world. It detailed how Mrs. Clinton planned to mobilize the Democratic base that had elected President Obama rather than appeal more broadly to the voters that had elected her husband. That strategy skipped over undecided voters who may have drifted over to Mr. Trump.

Photo

Credit Ty Wright for The New York Times

Abandoned

This story reveals how the Republican elite stopped paying attention to their party’s blue-collar, less affluent base, paving the way for the rise of Mr. Trump.

Photo

Credit Todd Heisler/The New York Times

The Veteran Vote

Since the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, the United States has been at war. This piece captured the resonance Mr. Trump’s campaign found among so many veterans, distrustful of the political class that sent them to fight and ignored or misunderstood back home.

Photo

Credit Ruth Fremson/The New York Times

No Plan B

This piece, way back in March of last year, diagnosed the Democrats’ most serious vulnerability. When the party stood by Mrs. Clinton as her email troubles built, it wasn’t just loyalty. It was inertia — a sign that, no matter how troubling the revelations might prove, there was no easy way to replace her.

Photo

Credit Al Fenn/The LIFE Picture Collection, via Getty Images

Jefferson Who?

By last fall, a Democratic shift was evident in the renaming of “Jefferson-Jackson” events. The reference to visionary elevations of the common man was lost as the party of organized labor reframed its priorities to lead with racial and sexual identity — a frustration for the white working class.

Source

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may also like

The New York Post Inspires Boycott With 9/11 Photo and Ilhan Omar Quote

[What you need to know to start the